Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Pumpkin is My Favorite Orange



This is the season of pumpkin, if you listen to advertisers. Everything is pumpkin. Go to a coffee shoppe and you can enjoy pumpkin muffins and coffee cake, and even pumpkin spice hot chocolate or coffee.

The other day I heard someone lament that there was no "pumpkin" in the pumpkin spice coffee from a popular national chain. Um, yeah, I'm huge fan of pumpkin, but, ew, not in my coffee. Further, they aren't advertising "pumpkin coffee." It's pumpkin spice, which means it's flavored to taste like our favorite pumpkin dish - pumpkin pie.

I told my daughter I could make her a pumpkin spice to go in her coffee at home - a little cinnamon, some ginger and a dash of nutmeg. If I'm feeling bold, I might sprinkle some cloves for a bit more kick.

It's not false advertising on their part, and the real criticism is not so much an absence of pumpkin, but rather the exorbitant calorie count when one includes all of the sugar, cream and whipped topping that accompanies that dessert in a cup pretending to be coffee.

I love pumpkin, but I'm not as enthusiastic about all of the pumpkin spice flavored things out there. Don't get me wrong. My favorite pie is pumpkin, especially if it's cold and has whipped cream on top. Yum!

But there are so many other ways to enjoy pumpkin, and I really love most of them as much as I like the pie ... and depending on the weather, maybe even more.

One of my favorite ways to enjoy pumpkin is in soup. I've recently discovered the spice, curry, and my favorite pumpkin soup would be curry pumpkin soup.

I also love pumpkin bread, especially canned. My daughters love it. The bread stays moist and fresh in the jars, and it travels well. It's become one of our favorite fall "fast foods" for those days when we're running from one class to another with errands in between.

I also like the cooked pumpkin, lightly mashed, drizzled with maple syrup and butter. Oh, my. It's a great side dish to spicy roast.

There are many ways we enjoy the pumpkin pulp, but we also value the seeds. Some of them, we'll save to plant next year, but most of them end up in the oven, roasted and eaten by the handful ... or tossed as a garnish on our pumpkin soup.

It's pumpkin season. What are you doing with this amazing fruit?


Easy Roasted Pumpkin Seeds

Ingredients:
Seeds from one pumpkin or squash (for us Hubbard squash and pumpkin are interchangeable in most recipes)
Olive oil
Salt to taste*

Directions:
1. Clean seeds of all stringy pulp.
2. Allow seeds to dry, not completely, but just so that they aren't sopping wet. You can use a towel to hasten this step, spread thinly on a screen for a bit, or even put them in the oven on a very low temperature for a few minutes.
3. Toss seeds with olive oil and salt.
4. Spread in single layer on a cookie sheet.
5. Roast at 350° for ten to fifteen minutes or until the seeds are golden brown.
6. Enjoy!

*Other seasonings can be added for a sweet or spicy flavor. Our favorite is just salted and roasted, but occasionally, we'll add a dash of cayenne for a fun zing.

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Abolish Daylight Savings Time

In an industrialized society, nature is always wrong. Humans are always better at it than nature. We're so much smarter, in fact, that in 1895 some wicked smaht human in New Zealand decided that we could, in effect, outsmart nature to give ourselves more daylight hours than nature naturally provides.

And Daylight Savings Time was born.

Eventually, everyone in the world caught on to this amazing idea, and after decades of manually setting clocks backward and forward depending on whether we were springing forward or falling back, clock manufacturers and makers of electronic devices that included LED clocks (like VCR's - relics, right? - and microwave ovens) thought to make things easy for us by programming those devices to spring and fall for us.

Some humans are smart ... you know, like the one's who believe themselves to be in charge. The rest of us are so stupid, we can't even manage to program our own clocks. Thank goodness someone had that brilliant idea.

But, then, of course, so that we wouldn't get too complacent or think that we had any control over anything, in 2007 someone in authority decided to standardize Daylight Savings time so that it begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November.

What that means is that all of our pre-2007, pre-programmed clocks are wrong.

I woke up this morning already an hour behind, because my clock told me it was one time, but it was actually an hour later.

Thanks everyone.

And next week, we get to do it all again. Yippee!


=============================================


Daylight Savings Time is an obsolete idea, and not only that, but there have been numerous studies showing the negative health effects caused by this unnatural interruption in our circadian rhythms.

At this point, it's a nuisance, but it can also be detrimental health-wise.

For reference here are a few articles that discuss the health aspect of Daylight Savings Time:

Daylight Savings Time Messes with Your Body Clock

Daylight Savings Time Disrupts Humans' Natural Circadian Rhythm

Daylight Savings Time May Increase Risk of Heart Attack

One of the reasons Daylight Savings Time was encouraged was the belief that more daylight hours would increase economic growth and human productivity. In this day of electric lights everywhere and online shopping, having longer store hours seems a little less necessary, and in fact, some recent studies suggest the opposite - that Daylight Savings Time actually has a negative impact on the economy.

Isn't it time we reevaluated this arcane practice and abolished this springing and falling each year? Seems like we have a lot more important stuff to worry about than whether or not we remembered to set our clock ... like urban farmers who are losing their right to grow sustainable food.


Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Alternative Energy




I've been fascinated by alternative energy options for a long time. My favorite alt energy system is the biogas digester, because it uses a fuel that is waste for most people (and, yes, the biogas digester can be fueled with humanure).

What's fascinating to me is that one of the complaints about our feedlot system is that there is no safe way to dispose of the copious amounts of waste, and I often wonder why they aren't using that waste to power the local community ... but that's another post.

My ideal solution for powering my home would be a combination of solar and wind to charge a battery bank for our electricity and biogas for water heating and cooking.

Ideally, we'd modify our existing septic system to be a biogas digester, but I'm actually told that's not possible, because the septic system is designed so that there isn't a gas build-up, and gas build-up is exactly what one wants with the biogas digester.

I've seen several videos on YouTube for DIY biogas digesters. Most of them are clumsy and messy looking, but this one was actually neat and tidy. What was also compelling about this design and model was that:
1. a woman assembled it; and
2. the woman filled it wearing a white shirt.

I think I could actually build one of these on my own. The set-up is pretty simple, and we, definitely have the fuel.

We couldn't use a biogas digester here in Maine for most of the year. In order for the microbes to work at breaking down the fuel and turning it into gas, the temperature needs to be around 64°F (or >18°C). Basically, I wouldn't be able to use it right now, because it's too cold - but given that my goal would be to use the biogas for cooking, primarily, it would actually work out perfectly for us. During the winter, I cook on the woodstove. During the summer, I cook inside on our electric stove, and we notice a marked increase in our electric bill during the summer.

The point is that I need an alternative cooking fuel more during the summer than during the winter, anyway. It would be worth it to have the digester for the free cooking fuel, even if we could only use it from May to September.

How about you? Would you build a digester? If not, what's your preferred alt energy?

Monday, October 20, 2014

Good Supplies to Have ... Another List



I frequently link to the 100 Items to Disappear First list. In fact, this post is the sixth post with the link. I'm probably posting it once a year, at this point.

The list was written by a war survivor, and it is things that they found became scarce quickly when supply lines are severed. I've always kept that list in mind when considering what things I want to have in my house.

There was a time when I would get really stressed out about what I didn't have, about gaps in my storing of the things on the list, and when that started happening with too great a frequency, I started to look at the list differently. Instead of trying to ensure that I have all of the things - in quantity - that are on the list, I started to think about alternatives. Like can openers. I have a can opener, even though I don't buy much canned food from the grocery store anymore, but I also have this handy little tool called a P-38. It's on my keychain. It's a manual can opener.

Other things I've just decided that I don't need, anyway, and I've learned to live without them. Like paper towels. I, actually, stopped using paper towels back before it became the "green" thing to do, because I hated the waste and the expense. We use cloth napkins at the dinner table, and we use cloth washcloths and towels in the kitchen. I repurpose old towels for rags that are used for wiping up spills and other cleaning tasks.

I also learned to make cloth feminine hygiene products, and I actually use them (I know, TMI. Sorry about that). We haven't made the leap into cloth toilet wipes, yet, but in a worst case scenario, we have plenty of old, too-stained-or-ripped-for-Goodwill clothes that can (and will) be repurposed.

I repost the 100 Items list frequently, but I also enjoy looking at other lists. This one of 50 Items You Forgot to Buy is a good, concise list. I like the explanation of why the author feels that each item should be stored. There are some pretty practical suggestions, several of which I also recommend in my book. Like books, games and musical instruments.

We have 37 of the 50 recommended items, but some of the items I just won't ever have.

I don't have, nor do I recommend, instant coffee. The reason the author recommends instant coffee is the possibility that the coffee maker won't work, but my family doesn't use a coffee maker. We use a French Press, and so, as long as I have hot water, I have brewed coffee.

My bigger concern would be not having coffee at all, because, where I live, coffee is always, and will always be, an import. Coffee beans don't grow in my climate.

Remember, I mentioned that these lists prompted me to think of alternatives? There is an alternative to coffee - at least with regard to taste - and it is available to me ... and most people that I know. Roasted dandelion root does, really, taste like coffee - without the caffeine. Dandelion is incredibly healthful, too, and if one is already drinking decaf coffee, switching will lose one none of the flavor, but will gain one all of the health boost.

The one thing I do like about the lists is that it's not just about prepping. Some of the recommendations are just good things to have on hand anyway, because they're things we often use on a regular basis. Getting an extra at the grocery store doesn't cost a lot and doesn't take up a lot of space.

From a preparedness point of view, I didn't actually understand the umbrella, but I don't really think it's a bad thing to have. Not really. It's practical and can be useful, and really, it doesn't take up much space. So, why not?

Eventually, we'll run out of the consumables on the lists, but things like the musical instruments, which my family already plays, the board games and the books - we won't, ever, use those up, and even without TEOTWAWKI, having them does make our life nicer.

I should also add that sometimes the alternative is not to change the thing, but rather to change how we acquire it. Like, maybe, it's not something one has to buy, but something one can make ... like the checkers board pictured above. I made the board using an old piece of plywood and a sharpie marker. The pieces are painted lids. No one ever said that we had to spend money on all of our supplies. Creativity is definitely welcome ... and encouraged :).

Based on the 50 Items list, how prepared are you?


Saturday, October 18, 2014

How Not to Be Poor

I've said it a few times, I'm pretty sure - poverty is not a state-of-being, rather it is a state-of-mind. I don't know how many times in my life, I've heard people who lived during the Great Depression say "We were poor, but I didn't even realize it." As children growing up in the Depression, these people had a home to live in, plenty of food, and adequate clothing. More often, rather than lamenting all they didn't have, they praise the ingenuity and frugality of their parents - the mom who never wasted anything, even making clothes out of feed sacks and soup out of onion tops and potato peels, and the dad who was a mechanical genius and could make a simple machine out of old screws and bailing wire.

Poor people today aren't like that. Well, actually, that's kind of a generalization and an unfair one, at that, but having been a poor person in America, my personal experience was more in keeping with being poor like the families discussed in this article.

My mistake was not just that I wasn't living within my means, but that I was trying to live at the income level I hoped to achieve once I was graduated from college and working in a full-time, professional position. One can not live on a $42,000 annual salary when one is only earning $8500 a year.

Getting into debt, I was encouraged to believe, was part of the ideal. Any debt I incurred during my undergraduate days would be magically erased (or at least manageable and nothing to worry about ... ignore-the-man-behind-the-curtain) as soon as I graduated. There was never any discussion about the time lag between achieving that coveted degree and actually having a job ... or the fact that once I graduated, I'd need to move, and moving costs money.

Oh, yeah, that.

As a college student living below the poverty line, even with my supplemental student aid money, I did not have the savings to move. Frankly, I didn't have any savings. At all. Nothing. I was not living paycheck-to-paycheck, but rather, quite literally, borrowing against next semester to get through the current one.

I ended up in the same kind of situation that is described in the article. I wanted all of that new stuff, and I never thought much about the debt I was incurring by financing stupid things, like furniture. Even worse, I was paying two to three times what those things were worth, after I paid all of the interest due.

Yes, I was guilty of renting-to-own.

I won't make excuses for myself. I was young and, in spite of being a college student, not all that smart about money-related things. Because I was a student, I was never able to fully admit how poor I was, but when $10 lost in transit from my bank to my house is a devastating loss and really does mean that food will be scarce for the week (and this was back in the 1980s), one knows things are pretty tight. I wouldn't admit that I was poor back then, because I was still living the lie that being poor was a moral failing, and also, because I couldn't be poor. I was doing all of the right things, right? I was going to college and ... you know ... making myself better.

And so, I did as much as I could to avoid the appearance of being poor.

Fast forward many years, and my attitude has changed, a lot. Deus Ex Machina and I furnished our first apartment together with furniture that was either given to us or purchased second-hand. Even today, most of the furniture in our house is either second-hand or was given to us, including this gorgeous farm table. We've bought a few new bookshelves, most of our beds were bought new, we have a couple of new office chairs, and the two five drawer chests were purchased new from a local carpenter who hand built them for us. I joke that our interior design scheme is shabby-shabby.

The point is that it doesn't matter, and frankly, if I ever replace the couch that has been repaired once and cost me $400 for the whole set of three (couch, loveseat and chair) at a yard sale, I'll probably buy the new one from a second-hand shop or yard sale. These days, between the second-hand stores, yard sales (both virtual and brick-and-mortar), and free-on-the-side-of-the-road opportunities, there is simply no reason to go into debt for furniture.

It was probably true back then, too.

There has to be a shift in attitude, and we have to let our kids know that it's okay to wait for stuff. It's okay to do without for a little while. It's okay to sleep on a mattress on the floor in the home office while one takes time to complete the renovation using cash rather than credit - and doing things the right way the first time so that ten years down the road, they don't have to be done again.

I am inspired by Johnny Sanphillipo's story of building his mortgage-free tiny house in Hawaii. The house is 480 sq feet, but he lives alone. If he wanted to make it big enough for a small family, he could add a second story and end up with a 960 sq ft house. Still small by today's McMansion standards, but my family of five shares 1500 sq ft (well, right now it's more like 1200 sq ft, because we had to do some extensive repairs of the back room and it's currently gutted), and we have plenty of room.

Sanphillipo spent ten years building his house, and he had to do some wiggling around building codes and such to get the project done, but it's done ... and it's gorgeous ... and it's two blocks from the beach ... um, did I mention in Hawaii?

I love what he says in the video about how the average person will take out a 30 year mortgage, but that no one pays off a house in 30 years. What usually happens is that the house will end up refinanced, and then, after having lived in the house their whole adult lives, at retirement, most people find that they are still paying a mortgage.

The bottom line is that there really are very few people in the United States of America who are living in soul-crushing poverty. Most of us, even the poor college-student me, end up making ourselves poorer by the very unwise financial choices we make. Spending money on ridiculous wants, like a new sofa for the living room, is a good example of that kind of short-sighted and ill-fated decision that pushes one further and further down the ladder of wealth.

In the end, not having money to spend on luxuries, like furniture, isn't what makes us poor. It's the belief that, without that couch, something is missing from our lives. If we allow ourselves to fall into that debt trap, that's when we become poor - not because we don't have money, but because we believe that having money to buy more is what makes us worthwhile as humans.

I think we can have it all ... just not right now, but it's the right-now attitude that creates poverty and keeps people poor.

This past summer we broke the handle on our wagon. It's been rusting out for a while, and so it wasn't a big surprise when it happened, just an inconvenience. In days past, we would have run out and purchased a new one, because, of course, we need it. Having the wagon allows us to make the most efficient use of our time, which means we have a better chance of being successful at this suburban homesteading thing while simultaneously living our full-time modern lives.


Deus Ex Machina and I are getting much better about knowing when to spend money getting something new and when to make use of the wealth of resources we have available to us for free. Like the cedar fence given to us for the cost of hauling it away that has been repurposed into all sorts of amazing things here on our homestead, including a piece being fashioned into a new wagon handle.

Friday, October 17, 2014

Should I Stay or Should I Go?

The headline caught my eye, Bug In or Bug Out? Why Conventional Wisdom May Be Wrong? I wondered, what does conventional wisdom say.

After reading the article, I still didn't know (although my suspicion is that most preppers believe bugging out is the only answer). What I did get was a very cool list of questions to help assess my individual situation.

I've always planned to adapt in place - to bug-in, if you will. My whole lifestyle, for the past seven years, has been about changing my attitude and actions, and learning to live where I am with what I have. I'm working on leaving the modern mind-set of everything is disposable to one in which everything is precious and has a use ... or doesn't and I should give it to someone who can find a use for it. The Three R's have governed my life for a long time (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle), and note that the first one is "reduce", i.e. live with less. We're getting better and better at this, every day.

I found the list of questions interesting, and so I thought I would share them. Whether you already have a bug-out plan or you haven't thought about it, yet, this list might help you to really assess your situation and figure out if you should stay or go.

  • Is my home easily defensible?
  • Do I have a safe room in my home or property?
  • Do I have a good mode of transportation if bugging out is necessary?
  • Do I have adequate supplies of fuel at my home to last at least a month?
  • Do I have an alternative source of electricity at my home?
  • Do I have enough food to provide each member of my family (or group) with 2,000 calories a day for at least a month?
  • Do I have adequate supplies of drinking water (at least one gallon per day) and cleaning water to last for at least a month, and the ability to purify new water?
  • Do I have weapons at home?
  • Do I live in a more rural setting, away from urbanized areas, but close enough to town?
  • Do I have strong support and good relations with the rest of my community?

According to the article, if you answer yes to most of them, you should stay. I answered yes to seven out of the ten.

Who's not surprised?

Sunday, October 12, 2014

A Morning of Pickling



This. Plus, seven pints of beets and one pint of carrots.

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Neither Label nor Eat

As a follow-up to the labeling post the other day, this wonderful article by Dr. Joe Mercola came through email this morning. As my daughter pointed out to me, the companies that care about my health (or rather whose profits are more tied to ensuring that I'm getting food I feel I can trust) are already avoiding GMOs and/or labeling their products to reflect their stance on the subject.

As the Mercola article points out, Genetic engineering is complex and unpredictable, resulting in pieces of DNA interacting with each other in unexpected and potentially dangerous ways. Genetic engineering of food is too new. We simply do not know what it will do to our bodies, and frankly, I'm not okay with having my body and the bodies of my children and grandchildren serve as the proverbial guinea pig to find out what GMO foodstuff will do.

I'm not even okay with using guinea pigs, actually.

There is enough evidence to show that organic farming techniques of non-GMO foods can feed the world's current population.

But I would also like to point out that every famine in the 20th century, every incidence of food shortages and hunger in our modern world had nothing to do with not enough food to go around, but rather has been a political and/or economical issue.

The Irish potato famine that killed a million people in Ireland happened because there was a failure of the potato crop (a fungus that was probably imported from somewhere else - kind of like the tomato and potato blight that hit the northeast a few years ago). The tragedy is not that these people depended solely on the potato for their food, but that the other crops that were being grown - and there were many, many crops being grown - were being exported to England and other places. The Irish, literally, starved to death, not because they lost their potato crop, but because the food that was being grown where they lived was being sold to someone else. It was economics and politics - pure and simple.

The same thing has played out in other countries. The famines in Ethiopia and across the sub-Saharan Africa, were a result of war and political unrest with millions of people fleeing the fighting and ending up in refugee camps. Some weather anomalies played into the failure of local crops, but there was plenty of relief food sent to the region. Most of it sat rotting while the people starved. Political.

Millions of people go hungry every day, not because there's not enough food, because millions of pounds of food - even in the poorest countries in the world - get wasted. In India, an estimated 40% of the produce in the country (where 40% of the population is vegetarian) rots before it gets to the customers.

The companies that engineer these genetically modified foods will tell us that we can't feed the world's population, but that's simply not true. There is plenty of food. In fact, I find food every time I go for a walk.

It's not a shortage of food that is the problem. It's access to the food.

I'm not sure we need labeling of GMO ingredients. What we need is a concerted effort to stop the large-scale production of these products, because everything they're telling us is a lie. They don't know what the long-term consequences of using these products will be - on the humans who consume them or the environment where they are grown.

And they are definitely not necessary to feed the starving masses. In that case, what we need is a complete overhaul of the system that outlaws kitchen gardens in front yards or packs people into slums where nothing grows, including the people themselves.

When land and food and water become commodities, some people can afford to the buy them and some people can't. Manufacturing pretend food is not what will feed us. Decommoditizing food and land, and more equally distributing them is what will.

I'm no longer calling for labeling GMOs. Now, I want to see them outlawed.

Friday, October 10, 2014

Should We Label?

I think children are underrated - not that people don't appreciate the little bundles of joy, but that, as a society, we tend to discount the opinions, thoughts and feelings of young people as being immature.

As a stay-at-home, homeschooling mom for the past seventeen years, I've discovered that the notion that children can't have incredibly insightful and valid opinions about things is inaccurate. If we listen, they can tell us things that we hadn't thought of. Adults tend to form opinions quickly based on years of experience, but consider that, sometimes our experiences negatively color our notions about life, and children, who haven't been so jaded, might actually be able to provide some insight that we hadn't considered.

This morning my teen says, "We don't need GMO labeling." She is well aware that this is a hot-button issue for me, because I'm very much in favor of transparency. Integrity is incredibly important to me, and I hold, in highest esteem, those who are honest and open with me. The quickest way to lose my trust and friendship is to let me catch you in a lie or deceit. I'll never trust you again, and I'll never forget that you'd lied to or cheated me. It's definitely a deal breaker.

So, of course, when she made that comment, I was all ears. "Yes?"

"Well, the companies who care about GMO labeling are already doing it."

I thought about the bag of veggie chips that was sitting opened on our counter. I thought about the crackers we occasionally put in our pantry. I thought about the corn chips that we keep handy for chips and salsa days and the corn taco shells we purchase for taco nights.

All of them are labeled "No GMOs", because that's important to us as consumers.

And, she's right. The companies that care about not putting potentially hazardous ingredients in our food already label their products accordingly. The companies that don't ... don't care, and they will fight to the end to NOT label their products, because once they start labeling, they will lose customers, or they will have to admit, publicly, that they don't give a shit about the small percentage of us who won't eat GMOs. I guess they believe that we are happy to perpetuate the notion that ignorance is bliss or that we really believe, what we don't know won't hurt us.

I'll probably still fight for GMO labeling ... at least as far as continuing to spread awareness about GMOs, and the fact that we don't know enough about the long-term effects to consider them safe - but maybe I'll stop worrying about fighting the GMA and its members to put those warning labels on their foodstuff, because the fact is that I already don't buy it, and frankly, in many of those products, the potential for GMO ingredients is the least of our worries.

Big Little Sister blogs at Adventures of Lifetime. I'm blessed every day to witness her amazing spirit and incredibly thankful for her insight.

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Pig Share

Many years ago, back and back and back (as the Giver tells Jonas every time he tries to explain some phenomena that Jonas won't understand until he has the memory), we were trying to find ways to save money at the grocery store.

It's a typical Western response to needing to find ways to cut back on expenses (you know, instead of cutting the cable bill, or not going to the Mall on Friday night). Most of us do it or have done it. The first place most of us start trying to cut is what we spend on food, and there are dozens of ways we try to do that - from using coupons to buying in bulk to buying the cheapest processed food we can find. Joel Salatin has a great article in this month's Mother Earth News magazine about how cheap and convenient food is actually neither.

So, back and back and back, Deus Ex Machina and I were approached by one of those freezer foods companies. Their spiel was that we could buy six months' worth of food for X dollars, plus the price of a freezer. We thought we were getting this stellar deal.

Until we started adding up the numbers and doing some price comparisons. For instance, we found the same (or at least a similar enough) freezer at the home improvement store for about a third of what we paid for the one from the freezer food company.

Using the freezer food company was very much like shopping at one of those bulk purchase stores, like Sam's Club, except that they delivered. If we were just looking at convenience points, the company is a 10/10.

If we're looking at the entire package, we're looking at a 2/10.

The prices were not cheaper. At best, they were comparable, but a lot of the food was stuff we didn't buy - at least not the brands that were delivered to us. For example, there were many packages of bagels, and we often purchased bagels, but usually we bought the huge deli bagels. The ones that were delivered to us were the grocery-store freezer kind that are about half the size of the ones we usually purchased. We paid the same price for half the food ... because they delivered.

And it wasn't six months worth of food, either. In fact, I was surprised by how quickly the freezer emptied.

Perhaps it could have been six months of food, if that food is supplemented by other things, but if that freezer full of food was all we had to eat, there's no way it would last six months. The meat lasted about two months. We might have had some of the other food products at the end of six months, but not because there was six months' worth, but rather because that food item (like bagels) was not a dietary staple.

Maybe they meant six months, one meal per day for two adults, and not six months, two to three meals per day for two adults, one teen-aged boy and a toddler.

Of course, the company didn't really want us to purchase all of those other foods, anyway. They're main product was meat, but compared to grocery store prices, we were actually paying twice per cut of meat what we'd pay at the grocery store. That said, it wasn't an apples to apples comparison. They didn't sell packages of plain ground beef. What they sold was single-serve packages of seasoned meats - things like chicken breasts marinated in lemon-pepper sauce and teriyaki-seasoned sirloin steak. It was incredibly convenient. Everything was done for me. All I had to do was to take the package out of the freezer a few hours before our meal to thaw, and then, pop it in the oven or fry it in a pan. Easy-peasy.

And that's what the company is banking on - that we want easy-peasy. The slick-talking sales woman who came to our house did some Pa Kettle math on us, and we thought we were getting a deal, but as it turns out, there wasn't a lot of anything (especially meat), and the price was a lot more than we would have spent in a month on our whole grocery bill, and worse, we still needed to go to the grocery store for other stuff, anyway.

We saved nothing, and we had nothing to show for it, but a very expensive freezer.

We only ordered from that company the one time, but we kept getting calls - of course. Eventually, we stopped buying meat from the grocery store, and one day they called, and I explained that there was really nothing their company had to offer us. The prices weren't that great, and besides, we'd transitioned to a local diet. I asked, "Where does your meat come from?" The answer was, essentially, "Not here." I explained that we were raising our own chicken, and we bought beef and pork from local farmers. I haven't heard from them in a very long time. I guess they took my name off the list ... finally.

I was thinking about that company today, not because I wanted to buy anything from them, but because, when they delivered our one order, it looked like quite a lot of food when they brought it in, and I wondered, how on earth they were going to fit it all in that freezer. The guy who delivered the freezer told me that the guy who would pack our freezer was a pro. He could fit six months' worth of food in a thimble.

I picked up our pig share today. The almost 200 lb. pig (hanging weight, and so the actual weight of the pork is less), joined the half cow, the 40-something whole chickens, and the sundry other bits and parts of previous farm-shares we've purchased or raised over the years (things like organ meats I'm not sure how to cook, fat I haven't gotten around to rendering, and chicken necks I still need boil for broth).

I was thinking, it would be nice to have someone to help me pack the freezer, because I thought it was full before I brought home the five paper bags full of pork.

Now, it's really full.

We'll eat well this winter.


One of the two brown ones pictured was the pig we brought home for our freezer a couple of years ago, raised by a friend of my daughters on her three-acre, rural suburban farm.

The butcher, who now knows me by name, packages the raw meat exactly the way I want - which is incredibly convenient. He will only season the ground pork (for sausage - and it's delicious!), but over the years, I've learned to season exactly the way my family likes, using herbs and spices that are organically and sustainably grown with no chemically-derived "natural" flavorings.

We were silly to try to save money by buying convenience, and even though we were duped that one time, we did learn our lesson. Convenience does not equal cheaper, and even when the freezer is full, there's still room for a pint of ice cream.

Monday, October 6, 2014

Warm Enough Still

After a day of painting the house, during which she assisted the whole time ... without complaint (and, in fact, volunteered, as in, Can I help? I changed my clothes and everything!), Precious helped me make soup for dinner.

Again, she volunteered.

It's chicken, and she listed off the vegetables that she wanted in the soup - potatoes, carrots, and cabbage. She wanted to add the garlic, and she wanted to add the spices.

Then she said, "I love cooking!"

That girl. Warms my heart.

I think I'll teach her to make biscuits tonight.

********************************


... and later.



She's a fast learner, and I imagine she'll be making them all by herself in no time ;).

Autumn Heat



It's that time of year again ... it's chilly enough in the house for us to feel chilly, but not cold enough, yet, to fire up the woodstove. We're in that limbo period of the year, waiting until we light the first fire.

As with so many of the years past, we've gotten to October, and we're looking at our store of firewood and realizing that we're not going to get through the winter if we can't find some more cord wood ... some where. We waited too long, as usual.

But it's also that, at the end of winter, when we scrounging dead wood for just one more fire ... you know, to take the edge off ... we're not thinking about finding wood for next year ... and then, it's late spring/early summer, and we're not thinking about how cold the next winter is going to be. We should be. But we aren't.

Again, as with so many years past, in the interest of conserving what little wood we do have, we're waiting to start our first fire.

The reality is that it's not cold enough, yet, for a fire. The thermostat in the hall says it's 65° ... in the coldest part of the house, which means, maybe, it's warmer in the parts of the house where we spend most of our time.

And we're also still able to warm up the house, a bit, in other ways. Cooking - especially baking - always makes things a bit toastier. We also throw open all of the blinds/curtains as the sun moves around the house to allow this solar passive heating to warm things up a bit. It works amazingly well. In fact, yesterday, I spent the afternoon outside (in short sleeves) painting, and when I came back inside the house, it was actually too warm and a bit stuffy.

The other day, Deus Ex Machina and Little Fire Faery helped a neighbor with moving some old newspapers, and Deus Ex Machina got to thinking about how those old papers could be used to heat a home. Paper, alone, isn't a very good heating fuel. It's great for starting the fire, but as the primary fuel, it would require a huge supply, and someone who could constantly monitor the fire and feed the stove. Kind of like the guy at the front of the steam engine on a train who is continually feeding coal into the fire to keep the train moving forward.

When I was a youngster, my family lived in the suburbs of Alabama, and we had a fire place. One chilly winter evening, my parents decided we needed a fire to warm things up in our den (the name for the family room - separate from the "living room", and not a "parlor" either - in 1970s suburban homes). We didn't have any firewood, nor any where to get it (because we didn't know much about gathering fallen dead wood, although I'm sure there would have been plenty of it, if we'd gone for a short walk). So, my father started rolling newspapers into dense paper logs. We burned those, and it was nice, but if one had to burn paper as a primary fuel source, rolling newspapers into logs is probably not the most efficient way to use it.

In our society, we have lots of sources for getting paper for heating fuel, but those papers come in all shapes and sizes - some of which would be great for rolling into logs, but others of which would be very poor for that use. The denser the log, the longer it will burn, and with some paper, it would just burn to quickly, because one couldn't manually roll it tight enough for it to be useful.

After working with the neighbor, Deus Ex Machina started wondering about paper logs - not the kind my father made, but logs made out of compressed paper - kind of in the way wood pellets are made.

And, then, he did what Deus Ex Machina always does. He got on the Internet and started doing some research, and he found several wonderful YouTube videos about making logs out of paper.

This video shows how to make a very simple press out of a piece of PVC pipe and a caulk gun. In the video, the paper is shredded before it is used in the caulk gun.

But the maker of the video started to wonder, what if I can't get shredded paper?, and so he made a second video showing how to make paper sludge, and using the same method as used in the first video, he made paper briquettes.

There were several other videos on making paper logs, and even some products that can be purchased to make paper into bricks for fuel. There was even one video of a guy who was engineering a way to make leaves into logs for burning.

As the maker of the above linked videos says, in some places, paper is abundant, but wood is not, and knowing how to make compressed paper into burnable logs, bricks or briquettes is definitely a worthwhile survival tool. For those who are concerned about deforestation, or those who live in suburban/urban areas where trees aren't as prolific as there are where I live, this kind of project would be incredibly useful.

Plus, the recycle/reuse aspect of the project makes me smile.


Sunday, October 5, 2014

Yes, I am Clean


I was reading an article today about this man who is traveling the US without any money. It's an interesting article, and I think a lot of the suggestions he makes for living free while traversing the country are applicable also to people who have a home to support. With the exception of the few bills suburbanites are naturally going to have to pay that he won't have to pay (like property taxes and the like), most of us could live with a lot less cash than we think we need.

Through much of the article, I was nodding my head and thinking, "yeah, I already do that, anyway," and while it felt good to note that I live a pretty eco-friendly life, I started wondering, if maybe, most of us do, and that the media hype about what the average American uses is just that - hype.

In particular, the man biking the country was talking about the personal hygiene products he uses. He says the only products he carries are toothpaste, Dr. Bronner’s Soap, a toothbrush, floss, and essential oil, which is interesting to me, because those are the only commercial products I use, too. In the interest of full disclosure, I also use a homemade deodorant, especially in the summer (not as much in the winter), consisting of baking soda, cornstarch, coconut oil and an essential oil (usually lavender, which is both nice smelling and anti-bacterial).

I don't use shampoo or conditioner. I don't use hairspray or gel or styling mousse. I don't use shaving creams or exfoliants or night creams or wrinkle creams. I don't use commercial deodorants or antiperspirants.

Most of the commercial products people use thinking they're getting cleaner or smelling better, not only don't make them cleaner, but they also cause one's body to produce more of the substances that those products are designed to take away. Using shampoo actually makes hair MORE oily rather than less. I wash my hair every other day using Dr. Bonner's bar soap (almond scented is my favorite). On the days I don't wash my hair, it's actually more silky and smooth than on the days I do wash it. Yes, that's right. I wash my hair only four times a week, and I never use conditioner ... and, yes, I have long hair.

I just wonder, though, if maybe we're being sold a bunch of lies. Like, maybe there aren't nearly as many people with a ton of products in their cabinets as the media claims. Maybe this guy - and me - with our austere stash of personal hygiene products are actually normal, and the media claims of the average American having a closet full of smelly stuff is just an attempt to get us to buy more.

In the interest of science, I would like to take a small poll. What's in your bathroom cabinet, with regard to personal hygiene products?

Gratuitous Fall Photo